Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [patch/rfc] kfail, not xfail descriptor parameter fails
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FB9565D.7000506@redhat.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 394 bytes --]

Hello,

GDB screws up the passing of function parameters when the ABI uses a 
descriptor (it passes the code instead of descriptor address). Anyway, 
it's a bug.  This changes the xfail's for that case into kfails 
(refining them a little - powerpc*-*-* is too broad, the tests work on 
some powerpc machines).

I think its almost but not quite obvious so I'll commit it in a day or so,
Andrew

[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2750 bytes --]

2003-11-17  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>

	* gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: Change the XFAILed descriptor test to a
	KFAIL.

Index: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/callfuncs.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.11 callfuncs.exp
--- gdb.base/callfuncs.exp	3 Apr 2003 16:34:48 -0000	1.11
+++ gdb.base/callfuncs.exp	17 Nov 2003 22:53:27 -0000
@@ -182,30 +182,27 @@
     gdb_test "p t_func_values(func_val2,func_val1)" " = 0"
     gdb_test "p t_func_values(func_val1,func_val2)" " = 1"
 
-    # On the rs6000, we need to pass the address of the trampoline routine,
-    # not the address of add itself.  I don't know how to go from add to
-    # the address of the trampoline.  Similar problems exist on the HPPA,
-    # and in fact can present an unsolvable problem as the stubs may not
-    # even exist in the user's program.  We've slightly recoded t_func_values
-    # to avoid such problems in the common case.  This may or may not help
-    # the RS6000.
-    setup_xfail "rs6000*-*-*"
-    setup_xfail "powerpc*-*-*"
-    if {![istarget hppa*-*-hpux*]} then {
-	gdb_test "p t_func_values(add,func_val2)" " = 1"
-    }
-
-    setup_xfail "rs6000*-*-*"
-    setup_xfail "powerpc*-*-*"
-    if {![istarget hppa*-*-hpux*]} then {
-	gdb_test "p t_func_values(func_val1,doubleit)" " = 1"
-    }
-
-    setup_xfail "rs6000*-*-*"
-    setup_xfail "powerpc*-*-*"
-    if {![istarget hppa*-*-hpux*]} then {
-	gdb_test "p t_call_add(add,3,4)" " = 7"
-    }
+    # GDB currently screws up the passing of function parameters for
+    # ABIs that use function descriptors.  Instead of passing the
+    # address of te function descriptor, GDB passes the address of the
+    # function body.  This results in the called function treating the
+    # first few instructions of the function proper as a descriptor
+    # and attempting a jump through that (a totally random address).
+    setup_kfail "rs6000*-*-aix*" gdb/1457
+    setup_kfail "powerpc*-*-aix*" gdb/1457
+    setup_kfail "powerpc64*-*-*" gdb/1457
+    setup_kfail hppa*-*-hpux* gdb/1457
+    gdb_test "p t_func_values(add,func_val2)" " = 1"
+    setup_kfail "rs6000*-*-aix*" gdb/1457
+    setup_kfail "powerpc*-*-aix*" gdb/1457
+    setup_kfail "powerpc64*-*-*" gdb/1457
+    setup_kfail hppa*-*-hpux* gdb/1457
+    gdb_test "p t_func_values(func_val1,doubleit)" " = 1"
+    setup_kfail "rs6000*-*-aix*" gdb/1457
+    setup_kfail "powerpc*-*-aix*" gdb/1457
+    setup_kfail "powerpc64*-*-*" gdb/1457
+    setup_kfail hppa*-*-hpux* gdb/1457
+    gdb_test "p t_call_add(add,3,4)" " = 7"
     gdb_test "p t_call_add(func_val1,3,4)" " = 7"
 
     gdb_test "p t_enum_value1(enumval1)" " = 1"

             reply	other threads:[~2003-11-17 23:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-17 23:14 Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-11-19 18:36 ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FB9565D.7000506@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox