From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18030 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2003 20:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18023 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2003 20:46:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2003 20:46:27 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84DA2B8F; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 15:46:23 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FA9619F.8030803@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 20:46:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J. Johnston" , Mark Kettenis Cc: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, marcel@xcllnt.net Subject: Re: RFA: ia64 patch required after recent osabi changes References: <3FA83E8D.8070709@redhat.com> <1031105022032.ZM25505@localhost.localdomain> <3FA95EDE.4000502@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2 > Patch checked in. This fixes the regression with the new osabi code and ia64 signal handling backtrace without having to remove the assertion. Nice. So everyone's clear, the assertion is correct and needed. The function is forcing an architecture switch so if the switch fails (what the assertion was checking) GDB's a bit stuffed. enjoy, Andrew