From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18253 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2003 20:28:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18229 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2003 20:28:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 2003 20:28:43 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3382B89; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:28:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3FA17479.1060100@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 20:28:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfc] New files "memory.[hc]" References: <3F99901B.6030005@redhat.com> <1031024210419.ZM3102@localhost.localdomain> <3F9D3C16.2070205@redhat.com> <1031027162402.ZM29516@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00860.txt.bz2 >> But is it a good idea, as in will it make the code easier to read, find, >> and understand? The old target-memory routines are all "hidden" (well i >> think they are :-) in gdbcore.h and corefile.c > > > I know it's kind of long, but how about "target-memory.[hc]" ? I think its a bit too long (right on the edge of 8.3). Andrew