> On Oct 27,  6:54pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> 
>> > preferences?
>> > 
>> > At the moment, I prefer the explicit registration of architecture
>> > variants.  I'd prefer to wait on adding the wildcard mechanism until a
>> > more compelling need for it is demonstrated.
> 
>> 
>> Per the discussion between myself and daniel, the current proposal is to 
>> add:
>> 
>>  > >  gdbarch_register_osabi (bfd_arch_powerpc, bfd_mach_ppc, ...
>>  > >  gdbarch_register_osabi (bfd_arch_powerpc, bfd_mach_ppc64, ...
>> 
>>  >
>>  > plus, I believe, either
>>  > + gdbarch_register_osabi (bfd_arch_rs6000, bfd_mach_rs6k);
>> 
>> to the linux file.  Is that pre-approved?
> 
> 
> Yes.

I've checked this in.  No more mysterious message during startup!

thanks,
Andrew