From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-28222-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26285 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2003 16:12:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26277 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2003 16:12:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Oct 2003 16:12:36 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 402BA2B89; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:12:35 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3F9D43F3.50603@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:12:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>
Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@mvista.com
Subject: Re: [rfa/doc/threads] thread breakpoints and system calls
References: <200310261459.h9QExPlc022980@duracef.shout.net> <1659-Sun26Oct2003193033+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00783.txt.bz2

> + It is legal behavior for a system call to return early, so @value{GDBN}
>> + does not cause your program to behave illegally.

Just for the future, would erroneous be a useful word?

Andrew