From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3849 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2003 00:06:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3842 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2003 00:06:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Oct 2003 00:06:56 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CB32B89; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:06:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F94789A.6010809@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 00:06:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Michal Ludvig , GDB Patches Subject: Re: [RFA] Find the most specific symtab References: <3F93F058.5060104@suse.cz> <20031020143057.GA29121@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00633.txt.bz2 > I don't know how this would affect overlay debugging. I don't suppose > any of our simulators are capable of overlays? FYI, Simulators can be used to test overlays. In fact (well from fuzzy memory) the testsuite machinery is written in a way that doesn't rely on overlay hardware. Andrew