From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17380 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2003 23:41:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17360 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2003 23:41:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Oct 2003 23:41:42 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716802B89; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 19:41:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F9472B5.4010807@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 23:41:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, dj@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] libiberty/cplus-dem.c:demangle_template() problem? References: <20031019055940.GD986@gnat.com> <20031020232753.GQ986@gnat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00628.txt.bz2 > Hello, > > I just committed the following change to libiberty in the GCC tree. > Apparently, the libiberty repository is not "shared" between GCC and > GDB. This fixes a SIGSEGV that occured in GDB. Is it ok to import > this change in the GDB sources? Yes. Any dj approved upstream change to gcc/libiberty is implicitly approved for src/libiberty. Andrew