From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25299 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2003 15:40:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25291 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2003 15:40:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Oct 2003 15:40:15 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B652B89; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:40:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F8C18DD.3020508@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:40:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8] References: <20031008165534.GA8718@nevyn.them.org> <20031008190502.GA13579@nevyn.them.org> <3F846B04.2070801@redhat.com> <3F85B4AC.7000000@redhat.com> <20031014013831.GB6118@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00452.txt.bz2 > > Does anyone have any other comments on these eight submitted patches? Ask michael. > So far, if I haven't lost any messages, the only disagreement is on > what to call impl_breakpoint: > user / implementation (my implementation) > user / machine (jim's suggestion) > logical / physical (how debuggers work) > virtual / actual (elena) > abstract / actual (elena) > > I think user / machine is the clearest of these. Others disagree with > me - no clear consensus. Pretty clear objections to your suggestions though: user/impl: + danielj user/mach: + danielj, jimb - cagney - michael - joel? logical/physical + cagney + joel? virtual/actual + elena? abstract/actual + elena? Andrew