Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: problem unwinding past pthread_cond_wait() on x86 RedHat 9.0
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F8C1523.5040704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031014125731.GA14097@nevyn.them.org>

> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:42:25PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> 
>> We now basically get almost nothing:
>> 
>>         #0  0xffffe002 in ?? ()
>>         #1  0x4002d379 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 ()
>>            from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0

Joel, what happens if you type:

(gdb) x/i 0xffffe002

Andrew

> That's NPTL.  Are you sure you understand the problem right - I don't
> have RH9's glibc here, only Rawhide's, but there's CFI for
> pthread_cond_wait in Rawhide.
> 
> So anyway this _will_ go away someday.
> 
> 
>> The problem I am now trying to solve is the following: How can we fix
>> the i386 unwinder to be smart enough to handle this wicked function?
>> Is this even possible? The only possibility I see right now is with
>> dwarf2 CFI, but then the problem I foresee is that we can not help
>> the people using the stock RH9. If the only hope is with CFI, then
>> they will have to update their pthread library...
> 
> 
> You really can't unwind past this sort of thing without either debug
> info or frame pointers.  How did it work in 5.3?  I'm assuming dumb
> luck, we unwound 0xfffffe02 wrong.
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-14 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-14  5:42 Joel Brobecker
2003-10-14 12:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-14 15:24   ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-10-14 15:46     ` Joel Brobecker
2003-10-14 15:52       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-14 16:15         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-14 16:18           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-14 16:19           ` Joel Brobecker
2003-10-14 15:53       ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-14 15:58   ` Joel Brobecker
2003-10-14 16:02     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-14 16:21       ` Joel Brobecker
2003-10-16 22:13         ` Richard Henderson
2003-10-15 19:34       ` Mark Kettenis
2003-10-23  1:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2003-10-23  2:41   ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F8C1523.5040704@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox