From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23472 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2003 02:21:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23341 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2003 02:21:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Oct 2003 02:21:32 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77C42B89; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 22:21:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F8617AA.7000908@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 02:21:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [v2] Re: RFA/RFC: vCont for the remote protocol [doco] References: <20030929152911.GA23320@nevyn.them.org> <3F78A178.5000302@redhat.com> <20030929212507.GA12032@nevyn.them.org> <3F799541.4070009@redhat.com> <20030930145103.GA26117@nevyn.them.org> <3F79A31C.8050403@redhat.com> <20030930211640.GA19869@nevyn.them.org> <3F7AE57C.3080100@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00348.txt.bz2 > Looks good. Can you send it as a formal proposal (as a protocol change) to gdb@, then give it a week? (Sigh of relief, didn't raise an eyebrow! :-) I'm ok with this doco, but check with Eli for the texinfo side of things (my be easier to just post the final texinfo). Andrew