From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8449 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2003 19:52:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8429 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2003 19:52:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2003 19:52:38 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1547C2B89; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 15:52:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F846B04.2070801@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:52:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Michael Snyder Subject: Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8] References: <20031008165534.GA8718@nevyn.them.org> <20031008190502.GA13579@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00252.txt.bz2 > On the infrastructure side we will be able to have an "impl_breakpoint" >> > (short for implementation; better naming ideas?) for each location we are >> > watching using hardware watchpoints. This will simplify a lot of code. It >> > will also eventually become easier to object-orient our breakpoints. > >> >> How about "user breakpoints" and "machine breakpoints"? > > > I like it. Daniel, did you mention somewhere that the debugger book used "logical" and "physical" breakpoint? If it does, it might be better to adopt its terminology here. Andrew