From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8316 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2003 19:04:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8297 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2003 19:04:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2003 19:04:10 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C262B89; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 15:04:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F845FA9.8010001@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:04:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elena Zannoni , Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Michael Snyder Subject: Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8] References: <20031008165534.GA8718@nevyn.them.org> <16260.19698.165606.470200@localhost.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00236.txt.bz2 > This is certainly the right direction. We have discussed this in very > general terms (I believe at the gcc conference), but I don't remember > a discussion on the gdb lists. Since this seems quite a big rewrite (I > am not sure, I just saw all this stuff appearing at once), how about > using the branching approach? It has worked well for a few features now. Honestly, yes. As core maintainers we should be willing to do as we ask. Andrew