From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4482 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2003 17:39:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4472 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2003 17:39:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2003 17:39:22 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812E72B89; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:39:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F844BC9.4090807@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 17:39:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Corinna Vinschen Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] sh-tdep.c (sh_use_struct_convention): Restructure and fix References: <20031004113939.GK11435@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3F7EED21.1060902@redhat.com> <20031004180852.GA29063@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3F818FAA.6050005@redhat.com> <20031007145205.GA10834@cygbert.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00224.txt.bz2 >> So? There's a judgment call here - will GDB be better off using the old >> or new technique during this transition period? Here, I think it is >> questionably the case that it is in everyones best interest to make the >> switch. This is because things will be in a much better position for >> the change to add a "struct value *function" method to the return-value >> code >> (I assume that that you're still working towards that). ... are you still working towards this? Andrew