From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-27626-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 11362 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2003 00:02:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 11355 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2003 00:02:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2003 00:02:25 -0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged))
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9802P110977
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:02:25 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9802ND15097;
	Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:02:24 -0400
Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9802Nw11692;
	Tue, 7 Oct 2003 17:02:23 -0700
Message-ID: <3F83540F.1040509@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:02:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: unwind support for Linux 2.6 vsyscall DSO
References: <200310070428.h974SDFm019376@magilla.sf.frob.com>
In-Reply-To: <200310070428.h974SDFm019376@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00187.txt.bz2

Roland McGrath wrote:

>>So?
> 
> 
> So how come noone else seems to know to_query is there? :-)

I knew.  Unfortunately, it's often proven inadequate, hence
there are separate queries for threads etc.

Maybe if to_query had been designed as an iterator in the first place...