From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13894 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2003 14:39:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13886 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2003 14:39:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Oct 2003 14:39:25 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5F62B89; Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:39:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F7EDB9C.1020308@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 14:39:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland McGrath , Jim Blandy Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] add-symbol-file-from-memory command References: <200310032302.h93N2ML1021147@magilla.sf.frob.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 [CC trimmed, not sure what the point was] >> An upstream BFD problem, on which this patch depends, wasn't resolved. >> Consequently, there there was no reason to review the patch - Roland >> should be aware of this since it was Roland's upstream BFD change that >> wasn't resolved. > > > What is unresolved? My bfd_elf_bfd_from_remote_memory implementation was > approved and committed to bfd in May. The code in the current binutils cvs > works fine for me as the basis for the gdb patches I have recently posted. See Elena's pointer into that thread. That code, in its current form, can only be described as a "work in progress". Andrew