From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11603 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2003 15:03:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11596 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2003 15:03:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (65.49.0.121) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2003 15:03:51 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DB32B8F; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 11:03:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F75A6D7.4090603@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 15:03:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Cc: Jerome Guitton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] ARM : one-line prologue analysis References: <200309260933.h8Q9X7w16542@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00598.txt.bz2 > PS Andrew, > > We seem to be horribly overloading and then exposing these special values > in the trad_frame interface. Wouldn't it make more sense to add more > routines to get and update the values, then we can hide the special > meanings entirely (and maybe even change the way they are recorded if we > need to). Yes. The last iteration of that added frame_p. Can you leave a dropping somewhere (either a comment in trad_frame*) or a bug report pointing this out. Andrew