From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16578 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2003 23:30:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16564 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2003 23:30:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2003 23:30:02 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DA42B89; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 19:30:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F7228FE.7040908@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:30:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Jim Ingham , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: complete command doesn't work for files... References: <20030924232504.GL1020@gnat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00545.txt.bz2 > Jim, > > I don't have any authority on the patch itself, but I do think that > it would be really worth to directly insert inside the code the text > of your changelog entry. I find it easier to find the relevant > information when it's inside the code, as opposed to inside the > ChangeLog. Joel, yes, that's correct pratice. ChangeLog contains what changed. The actual file should change why. Andrew >> * completer.c (complete_line): For filename completions, when you >> look for >> the last word before the cursor, actually start from the cursor & >> work backwards, >> rather than starting from the word you were handed. Starting >> from the >> word doesn't work if the input contains more than one word - as >> it does >> in the complete command. > > >