From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15138 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2003 21:23:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15124 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2003 21:23:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Sep 2003 21:23:50 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C106C2B89; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:23:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F70B9E6.5000106@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:23:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] Don't print saved registers with no name References: <20030922162202.GA4953@nevyn.them.org> <3F6F233A.5020904@redhat.com> <20030923203049.GA10153@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00510.txt.bz2 > - if (i != SP_REGNUM) > + if (i != SP_REGNUM > + && gdbarch_register_reggroup_p (current_gdbarch, i, all_reggroup)) Yep, thanks. > [Both patches display sp an extra time. I don't see a way around it, > with this code the way it is... does anyone else?] Don't be too worried about the duplication - SP_REGNUM is going away anyway. However, bug report it so hopefully I can discover that eliminating SP eliminated the problem :-) Andrew