From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11539 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2003 00:51:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11532 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2003 00:51:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Sep 2003 00:51:43 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5600D2B89; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 20:51:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F6CF61E.3080502@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 00:51:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [testsuite] add gdb.cp/gdb1355.exp References: <200309182127.h8ILR57W000549@duracef.shout.net> <3F6CCAC7.3020108@redhat.com> <20030920223104.GA22943@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00437.txt.bz2 > Per the discussion last time, I think its far cleaner and more efficient >> use of our resources to just cut our losses and yank the lot. > > > They're orthogonal... Good point. > No objections to yanking the lot, but I wouldn't mind a list such as > Michael suggests. Andrew