From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20813 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2003 23:39:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20806 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2003 23:39:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2003 23:39:18 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C32B2B89; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 19:39:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F6CE525.7040304@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:39:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [6.0] PROBLEMS and NEWS References: <3F6CBFA5.7060308@redhat.com> <20030920223556.GA23118@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00434.txt.bz2 > On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 04:59:17PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> This patch significantly expands the 6.0 NEWS file. It also drops a >> strong hint about PPC, MIPS, SPARC and ARM in the problems file. >> >> Comments, objections, complaints? > > > Looks good to me. Are PPC, MIPS, and SPARC the only ones left on > mainline? I know Mark's got a SPARC update in the works, too. I didn't what to say anything that could put Mark on the spot (which is why I mentioned the Arm as it's up-to-date). I picked those as I know they are going to get used. That can't, for instance, be said of the vax :-) >> +variables (even in optomized code). > > > "optimized". And I even spell checked it, just not enough. Doh! Andrew