From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24172 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2003 00:31:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24137 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2003 00:31:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2003 00:31:11 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8A0V9l07008; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:31:09 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8A0V7L06976; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:31:08 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8A0V7w20288; Tue, 9 Sep 2003 17:31:07 -0700 Message-ID: <3F5E70CA.10003@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:31:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christopher Faylor CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [anoncvs] server problem? References: <3F5E1AF6.60804@redhat.com> <20030909183245.GA8867@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20030909183245.GA8867@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00193.txt.bz2 Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 11:24:54AM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > >>The directions on the gdb homepage don't seem to work: >> >>[msnyder@reddwarf rda]$ cvs -d >>:pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/gdb login >>(Logging in to anoncvs@sources.redhat.com) >>CVS password: >>/cvs/gdb: no such repository >>cvs [login aborted]: authorization failed: server sources.redhat.com >>rejected access > > > Wow. Old bug, I think. Should be fixed now. Fixed, thanks.