From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17910 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2003 21:52:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17901 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 21:52:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 21:52:25 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h83LqNl12920 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 17:52:24 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h83LqML27801 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 17:52:22 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h83LqLw03743; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:52:21 -0700 Message-ID: <3F566295.7050305@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 21:52:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Brolley CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Split Ipipe.exp test into seperate versions. References: <3F56350B.500@redhat.com> <3F563B1A.3080903@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3F563B1A.3080903@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 Dave Brolley wrote: > One minor change -- replace "venus" with "frv". Other than that, it's > approved to commit. Changed and committed. > Michael Snyder wrote: > >> The fr400 wasn't really being tested, because of a typo. >> When I fixed the typo, the fr400 failed the test, because >> of an LSI difference (it places the address of the VLIW >> bundle into EPCR0, rather than the address of the insn >> causing the interrupt). So I've split the test case >> into two. >> > >