From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-26772-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 12073 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2003 18:35:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 12013 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2003 18:34:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Sep 2003 18:34:55 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (toocool.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.72])
	by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 98713800338; Tue,  2 Sep 2003 14:34:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3F54E2C9.6050006@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 18:35:00 -0000
From: "J. Johnston" <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: patch to ignore dump.exp for ia64
References: <3F4673A0.3040507@redhat.com> <3F46823D.2070006@redhat.com>	<3F4A7C44.4080407@redhat.com> <3F4CF346.1010408@redhat.com>	<3F4CF4EB.5090408@redhat.com> <3F4E4542.3080709@redhat.com> <jed6ekdxzt.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <jed6ekdxzt.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2

Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "J. Johnston" <jjohnstn@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> 
>>Index: gdb.base/dump.exp
>>===================================================================
>>RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dump.exp,v
>>retrieving revision 1.3
>>diff -u -r1.3 dump.exp
>>--- gdb.base/dump.exp	2 Jun 2003 15:51:24 -0000	1.3
>>+++ gdb.base/dump.exp	28 Aug 2003 18:00:55 -0000
>>@@ -33,12 +33,18 @@
>> set binfile  ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
>> set options  {debug}
>> 
>>+set is64bitonly "no"
>>+
> 
> 
> Why not just using 0/1 instead of "no"/"yes"?
> 
> Andreas.
> 

Just a matter of arbitrary choice.  The lines I based it on were using strings.
It certainly isn't misleading or incorrect.

-- Jeff J.