From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7190 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2003 21:34:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7160 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2003 21:34:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Aug 2003 21:34:53 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCE02B7F; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:34:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F4BD27C.9080502@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:34:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: * solib-svr4.c (bfd_lookup_symbol): New SECT_FLAGS argument. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00458.txt.bz2 Jim, What was the final out come of this patch? 2003-06-11 Jim Blandy * solib-svr4.c (bfd_lookup_symbol): New SECT_FLAGS argument. (enable_break): Pass SEC_CODE as the SECT_FLAGS argument to bfd_lookup_symbol, since we only want symbols in code sections. (look_for_base): Pass zero as the SECT_FLAGS argument to bfd_lookup_symbol, since we're not concerned about which section the symbol is in. it appears to be approved, but not committed? http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-06/msg00430.html Andrew