Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Johnston" <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: lin-lwp and exiting threads
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 19:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F4BAA4B.6050508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030826175418.GA25424@nevyn.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 01:51:35PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
>>Hi Jeff,
>>
>>I'm doing some work in lin-lwp.c and I saw this bit you recently committed:
>>
>>+      /* Check if the current LWP has previously exited.  For nptl threads,
>>+         there is no exit signal issued for LWPs that are not the
>>+         main thread so we should check whenever the thread is stopped.  */
>>+      if (!lin_lwp_thread_alive (lp->ptid))
>>+       {
>>+         if (in_thread_list (lp->ptid))
>>+           {
>>+             /* Core GDB cannot deal with us deleting the current
>>+                thread.  */
>>+             if (!ptid_equal (lp->ptid, inferior_ptid))
>>+               delete_thread (lp->ptid);
>>+             printf_unfiltered ("[%s exited]\n",
>>+                                target_pid_to_str (lp->ptid));
>>+           }
>>+         if (debug_lin_lwp)
>>+           fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
>>+                               "SWC: %s already exited.\n",
>>                                target_pid_to_str (lp->ptid));
>>
>>
>>This is right after waitpid has returned a non-exiting stopped status for
>>lp->ptid.  Were you just being thorough, or do you have some reason to
>>believe that waitpid would ever return WIFSTOPPED (status) and yet the
>>thread would be dead?
> 

In the early days of nptl, the kernel wasn't always doing what it was
expected to.  This appears to be leftover code as I attempted to ensure we
caught the thread exiting one way or another.

> 
> Also, there's:
>   pid = waitpid (GET_LWP (lp->ptid), &status, 0);
>   if (pid == -1 && errno == ECHILD)
>     {
>       pid = waitpid (GET_LWP (lp->ptid), &status, __WCLONE);
>       if (pid == -1 && errno == ECHILD)
>         {
>           /* The thread has previously exited.  We need to delete it now
>              because in the case of NPTL threads, there won't be an
>              exit event unless it is the main thread.  */
>           if (debug_lin_lwp)
>             fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
>                                 "SWC: %s exited.\n",
>                                 target_pid_to_str (lp->ptid));
>           delete_lwp (lp->ptid);
>           return 0;
>         }
>     }
>   
> Is there some reason you don't also call delete_thread?
> 

Hmm, appears to be an oversight on my part.

Do you want to make these changes?

-- Jeff J.


  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-26 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-26 17:52 Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-26 18:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-26 19:17   ` J. Johnston [this message]
2003-08-26 18:48     ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F4BAA4B.6050508@redhat.com \
    --to=jjohnstn@redhat.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox