From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 862 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2003 15:29:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 852 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2003 15:29:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.131) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Aug 2003 15:29:42 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55702B87; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:29:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F3907E1.4090607@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:29:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Ben Elliston , Nick Clifton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: DejaGnu merge References: <87znif8p81.fsf@sashimi.wasabisystems.com> <87fzk75cnm.fsf@sashimi.wasabisystems.com> <3F3905EC.6050205@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00194.txt.bz2 \ > `Adopt a policy of only using well-tested dejagnu releases'? The current src/dejagnu is based on a release + a set of specific up-stream approved patches (namely KFAIL). The expectation, consistent with readline, is that at iregular intervals, a new release would be merged in allowing the number of upstream patches to be redused. PS, For those that are wondering. Ben is involved in some very recent upstream dejagnu development activities. See: http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/dejagnu/dejagnu/ChangeLog Andrew