From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7240 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2003 19:05:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7232 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2003 19:05:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.131) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2003 19:05:08 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7E12B7F; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:05:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F26C564.5000302@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:05:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Carlton Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfc, rfa/gdb.c++, 6.0] Annotate 3 testsuite References: <200307290420.h6T4KvDg003437@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00513.txt.bz2 > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:20:57 -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain said: > > >> Also -- when you add files to gdb.c++, you have to add to >> config/djgpp/fnchange.lst. Maybe somday we could start adding >> new files to gdb.cpp or something to get out from under that. > > > Makes sense to me. We use 'cp' to refer to C++ elsewhere in GDB, so > while I would normally prefer 'gdb.cpp' over 'gdb.cp', consistency > might argue for the latter. Remember, the true believers amongst us still think `cpp' is the C pre-processor (and a system with a C++ compiler, by definition, is not UNIX like :-^) so gdb.cp might actually be better :-) Andrew