Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp, new test script
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F1429BE.3040904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307151613.h6FGDvnQ011927@duracef.shout.net>

> Rats, I said I would do this yesterday.  Here it is: a new test script
> for PR gdb/1250.
> 
>   http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1250
> 
> This is the bug where gdb loses its marbles when backtracing through a
> function which calls a noreturn function such as 'abort'.  The calling
> function has no epilog after the call to 'abort', so when gdb looks at
> the frame for that function, gdb sees the first instruction of the
> *next* function and uses information for that function instead.
> 
> This happens in gdb.base/corefile.exp but I think it is nice to have a
> specific test for it.
> 
> I tested this on native i686-pc-linux-gnu with gdb HEAD, gcc 2.95.3 and
> v3, dwarf-2 and stabs+.
> 
> It PASSed with gcc 2.95.3 because gcc 2.95.3 does not optimize away the
> epilog.  I think that this is okay.  The gdb user really just wants to
> put breakpoints on things like 'abort' and 'exit' and have it work, and
> if it works because the compiler is simple, that is okay.
> 
> It KFAILed with all the gcc 3.3's that I used.
> 
> I would like to commit this to HEAD, wait a few days or a week, and then
> commit it to gdb_6_0-branch.
> 
> OK to commit?

Definitly, and thanks.

Andrew



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-15 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-15 16:14 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-07-15 16:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-07-16 19:33   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-15 16:20 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-07-15 16:31 Michael Elizabeth Chastain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F1429BE.3040904@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mec@shout.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox