From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9676 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2003 20:44:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9658 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2003 20:44:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Jul 2003 20:44:19 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DD42B5F; Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:44:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F0B2D22.1040106@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 20:44:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch, rfc, 6] Check for "main" in minimal symbols in BT References: <3F09DB1D.6070003@redhat.com> <20030707210756.GA19339@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00162.txt.bz2 > > Definitely like the patch! Should we make inside_entry_func also check > the minimal symbol table? Since we have the entry point PC reliably > (via ELF headers). Hmm, did I mention that inside_entry_func isn't called :-) (also check the e-mail between my self and JimB, entry_point_address isn't reliable - there are cases where it isn't but needs to be re-located or indirected). Andrew