From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26521 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2003 19:05:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26498 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2003 19:05:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Jul 2003 19:05:43 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F8A2B5F; Mon, 7 Jul 2003 15:05:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F09C482.8070003@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:05:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch, rfc, 6?] Enable identical frame sanity check References: <3F03241B.1020908@redhat.com> <20030702183600.GB8828@nevyn.them.org> <3F044B63.8070407@redhat.com> <20030707141608.GC27227@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2 >> The other choice is to treat it as undefined and accept the warning. > > > Both make sense to me. Probably the warning is better. I think we > should figure out why inside_entry_func isn't stopping the backtrace > before this even becomes an issue, though... See my other post, inside_main_func() is broken when there are only minimal symbols. BTW, the inside_entry_func test is disabled pending evidence supporting its need. With inside_main_func fixed, there's still no evidence. Andrew