From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10773 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2003 14:12:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10766 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2003 14:12:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.166.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Jul 2003 14:12:44 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369EB2B74; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 10:12:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3F0196DA.6010607@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 14:12:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, rearnsha@arm.com Subject: Re: [RFA/ARM] Framificate the ARM port [1/3] References: <20030630225129.GA30660@nevyn.them.org> <3F018D29.70401@redhat.com> <20030701140020.GB10520@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 > On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 09:31:21AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> >+ CORE_ADDR saved_regs[1]; > >> >> Any chance of this using trad-frame? > > > See patch #3. I didn't want to do that until I was ready for > prev_register. It doesn't use your most recent changes to trad-frame > (valid_p); I'll do that in a follow-up. Yes, just noticed that, sorry. Andrew