Re: [RFA] linux-proc: use lwp instead of merged_pid in gcore files.

[Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>]

J. Johnston wrote:
> J. Johnston wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:11:38PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jeff, here's a patch that accomplishes the same thing as yours,
>>>> using mostly existing code and data.  I have tested it on old
>>>> linux threads, but not on nptl threads.
>>>>
>>>> Daniel, I went with your suggestion for "linux-nat.h", and I
>>>> moved one declaration from config/nm-linux.h to the new file.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure who's approval you're waiting for, but this looks might
>>> good to me.  Let's have someone with NPTL installed confirm it...
>>>
>>
>> Will do.
>>
>>> Oh, one nit.  Create $(linux_nat_h) in Makefile.in, please.
>>>
>>> [I'll switch to using linux-nat.h before committing the fork patch,
>>> once it's approved.  I'm not going to repost it now though.]
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> Tests run on x86 RH9.
> 
>         === gdb Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes        8988
> # of unexpected failures    35
> # of unexpected successes    2
> # of expected failures        47
> # of known failures        31
> # of unresolved testcases    1
> # of unsupported tests        2
> 
> 
> the gdb.threads/gcore-thread.exp testcase ran successfully.

I'll take that as confirmation.  Consider this committed
(I'll get to it shortly).


> There is still a formatting mess for the output which you have already
> noticed.

Thanks for verifying that.  Shame none of the testsuites caught it...   ;-)