From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8316 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2003 18:53:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5993 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2003 18:52:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.129.200.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jun 2003 18:52:28 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (toocool.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.72]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C04800030; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 14:52:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EF20660.30104@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 18:53:00 -0000 From: "J. Johnston" Organization: Red Hat Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J. Johnston" Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] linux-proc: use lwp instead of merged_pid in gcore files. References: <3EF0FFBA.7030509@redhat.com> <20030619005314.GA14616@nevyn.them.org> <3EF1CBD5.2030406@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00631.txt.bz2 J. Johnston wrote: > > > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:11:38PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: >> >>> Jeff, here's a patch that accomplishes the same thing as yours, >>> using mostly existing code and data. I have tested it on old >>> linux threads, but not on nptl threads. >>> >>> Daniel, I went with your suggestion for "linux-nat.h", and I >>> moved one declaration from config/nm-linux.h to the new file. >> >> >> >> I'm not sure who's approval you're waiting for, but this looks might >> good to me. Let's have someone with NPTL installed confirm it... >> > > Will do. > >> Oh, one nit. Create $(linux_nat_h) in Makefile.in, please. >> >> [I'll switch to using linux-nat.h before committing the fork patch, >> once it's approved. I'm not going to repost it now though.] >> > > Tests run on x86 RH9. === gdb Summary === # of expected passes 8988 # of unexpected failures 35 # of unexpected successes 2 # of expected failures 47 # of known failures 31 # of unresolved testcases 1 # of unsupported tests 2 the gdb.threads/gcore-thread.exp testcase ran successfully. There is still a formatting mess for the output which you have already noticed. -- Jeff J.