From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17541 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2003 01:23:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17533 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2003 01:23:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jun 2003 01:23:27 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5J1NQH24426 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:23:26 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5J1NPS10021; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:23:26 -0400 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5J1NPK02642; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:23:25 -0700 Message-ID: <3EF1108D.9050109@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 01:23:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: "J. Johnston" , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] linux-proc: use lwp instead of merged_pid in gcore files. References: <3EF0FFBA.7030509@redhat.com> <20030619005314.GA14616@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00617.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 05:11:38PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > >>Jeff, here's a patch that accomplishes the same thing as yours, >>using mostly existing code and data. I have tested it on old >>linux threads, but not on nptl threads. >> >>Daniel, I went with your suggestion for "linux-nat.h", and I >>moved one declaration from config/nm-linux.h to the new file. > > > I'm not sure who's approval you're waiting for, but this looks might > good to me. Let's have someone with NPTL installed confirm it... Call it review, then. Maybe Jeff Johnston will do that for us. > Oh, one nit. Create $(linux_nat_h) in Makefile.in, please. 'k.