From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13213 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2003 14:22:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13205 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2003 14:22:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.166.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2003 14:22:43 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACF42B63; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:22:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EF075B1.7040900@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:22:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: "disconnect" command References: <20030614042642.GA28231@nevyn.them.org> <3EEF2CCF.7020708@redhat.com> <20030617215951.GA23468@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00593.txt.bz2 > Thoughts? OK? > >> >> The code, yea. Just check that part in. >> >> The doco, though, does not belong in ``Implementing a remote stub'' :-( >> (the existing doco is scrambled). > > > Yeah, it is. I was trying to avoid rewriting it, but since you > asked... > Is this better? Honestly, and with out looking at the result. It can't be worse :-) > Eli, I think I got the Texinfo and general structure > right, but I'd appreciate it if you'd look over this anyway. Much better structure :-) Andrew