Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> Here's an updated patch. The more I looked at the "struct type *type" 
>> argument, the less I understood about how it should be used. I assume 
>> it would only be used, so far, on i386, but I'm easily confused by 
>> stacks and registers (and how things are stored there), so any 
>> pointers would be appreciated.
> 
> 
> The patch is almost fine.  Change it to `F' instead of `f' - so that a 
> predicate is also available.
> 

OK, I made this change.