From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31704 invoked by alias); 31 May 2003 16:49:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31672 invoked from network); 31 May 2003 16:49:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ms2.dkm.cz) (62.24.64.14) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 May 2003 16:49:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 16453 invoked by uid 0); 31 May 2003 16:49:20 -0000 Received: from r2ad157.mistral.cz (HELO suse.cz) (62.245.93.157) by ms2.dkm.cz with SMTP; 31 May 2003 16:49:20 -0000 Message-ID: <3ED8DD25.9040109@suse.cz> Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 16:49:00 -0000 From: Michal Ludvig Organization: SuSE CR s.r.o. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507 X-Accept-Language: cs, cz, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ac131313@redhat.com, eliz@elta.co.il Subject: Re: [RFA/i386newframe] info cfi command References: <3ED60F2A.9060108@suse.cz> <200305291629.h4TGTLe0000304@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3ED74F9A.4000309@suse.cz> <200305311635.h4VGZ2hO005709@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200305311635.h4VGZ2hO005709@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00589.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis wrote: > Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 14:33:30 +0200 > From: Michal Ludvig > > Mark Kettenis told me that: > > From: Michal Ludvig > > this patch adds 'info cfi' command which is to be used for examining > > debug info. For now it only prints the instructions in a hex-form, but > > I'll make a resolver to nice strings later. > > > > Hmm, I wonder whether that should be a maintenance command instead: > > 'maintenance print cfi' > > or even > > 'maintenance print dwarf cfi' > > or something like that. > > I named it "maint print dwarf2-cfi" - is that OK? > > As per Andrew's maint info frame/maint print frame post, "main info > dwarf2-cfi" would be more appropriate. No problem. > The attached version already resolves the data to verbose instructions > like DW_CFA_nop. Documentation is also there. > > Can I commit it? > > Hmm, I'd prefer that all exported functions from dwarf-frame.c are > prefixed with dwarf2_frame_. OK. > Could you sit on it for a while until I've finished moving over > dwarf-frame.c to mainline? Sure. I'll post a new patch for mainline once you're done. Michal Ludvig