From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18270 invoked by alias); 29 May 2003 14:56:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18235 invoked from network); 29 May 2003 14:56:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos.suse.cz) (195.47.106.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 May 2003 14:56:22 -0000 Received: from chimera.suse.cz (chimera.suse.cz [10.20.0.2]) by kerberos.suse.cz (SuSE SMTP server) with ESMTP id E667A59D94E; Thu, 29 May 2003 16:56:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from suse.cz (naga.suse.cz [10.20.1.16]) by chimera.suse.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525F04F68; Thu, 29 May 2003 16:56:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3ED61F95.7090608@suse.cz> Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 14:56:00 -0000 From: Michal Ludvig Organization: SuSE CR, s.r.o. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507 X-Accept-Language: cs, cz, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/i386newframe] info cfi command References: <3ED60F2A.9060108@suse.cz> <8011-Thu29May2003171558+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> In-Reply-To: <8011-Thu29May2003171558+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00538.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii told me that: > If the code is approved (I cannot approve it), please write a change > for the manual that documents the new command. I'd like to avoid a > situation where we have undocumented commands. To which section should it go? Examining Data? Source and machine code? Information about a frame? Somewhere else? Michal Ludvig -- * SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz * (+420) 296.545.373 * http://www.suse.cz