From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24875 invoked by alias); 15 May 2003 17:12:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24777 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 17:12:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.166.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 May 2003 17:12:17 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FCD2B2F; Thu, 15 May 2003 13:12:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EC3CA6D.5060306@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 17:12:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lance Taylor Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Use $(SHELL) when running mkinstalldirs References: <20030514062315.8589.qmail@gossamer.airs.com> <3EC23BA9.2050409@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 > Andrew Cagney writes: > > >> I"m guessing that this is an [RFA], rather than a [commit]. Yes, ok. > > > Thanks. > > I missed the Subject line conventions somehow. Are they written down > anywhere? No. But then people don't have to follow them. It's just that ``patch'' has been found to be too ambigious :-) Andrew