From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4387 invoked by alias); 12 May 2003 19:24:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14897 invoked from network); 12 May 2003 19:19:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.131) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 May 2003 19:19:06 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3FA2B2F; Mon, 12 May 2003 15:19:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EBFF3A8.3080306@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 19:24:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Warkentin Cc: "Gdb-Patches@Sources.Redhat.Com" Subject: Re: [patch] remove pointless call. References: <16b401c318b2$c4ced340$0202040a@catdog> <3EBFEA30.3040108@redhat.com> <16d001c318ba$7eaa0080$0202040a@catdog> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2 >> > Okay to apply? The TARGET_FIND_AND_OPEN_SOLIB removes the need for this >> > call. > >> >> Yes (obvious?). > > > Is it in general okay to just post and apply patches to my own files if > they're obvious? Yes. Whats the worst you could do, break it? :-) > Do I need to be put down as a target specific maintainer > or some such? I'll go and ask the global maintainers. Andrew