From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2221 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 16:09:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2158 invoked from network); 10 May 2003 16:09:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.166.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 May 2003 16:09:14 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADE22B4E; Sat, 10 May 2003 12:09:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EBD2429.2070005@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 16:09:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/i386newframe] Add support for .eh_frame sections References: <200305101551.h4AFpP6V075266@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 > Hope nobody minds about the lack of details on the ChangeLog entry. > This defenitely could use some more testing, but if I comment out the > .dwarf_frame support and use gcc -fexceptions, this produces identical > results for the testsuite as before on my system. Perhaps ``maint set/show dwarf2cfi|eh-frame on|off''? Andrew