From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12451 invoked by alias); 9 May 2003 22:36:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12434 invoked from network); 9 May 2003 22:36:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.131) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2003 22:36:36 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613C92B2F; Fri, 9 May 2003 18:36:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3EBC2D6D.70001@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 22:36:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: "J. Johnston" , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: nptl threading patch for linux References: <3EA84E74.3010101@redhat.com> <20030509220011.GA22383@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00148.txt.bz2 > On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 04:52:04PM -0400, J. Johnston wrote: > >> The following is the last part of my revised nptl patch that has >> been broken up per Daniel J.'s suggestion. There are no generated >> files included in the patch. > > > Well, this patch doesn't work for me :( Using 2.5.69, since I don't > have any of the Red Hat kernels available here at the moment. It looks > like GDB bellies up around the second thread creation. Hmm, I've a horrible feeling that people are going to get bogged down trying to sort out which GLIBC and Kernel they should all use. Is there a list of Kernel and GLIBC fixes that are needed? Andrew