Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA/RFC: dump symtab and psymtab lists
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E9C29EE.30409@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vt2brz8zg5b.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com>

> Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> > How about 'maint show {,p}symtab'?  That's consistent with the main
>> > 'show' command (which displays information about GDB's state), and has
>> > no conflicting precedent.
> 
>> 
>> No.
>> 
>> `show' is for ``showing [and setting] things about the debugger'' -
>> show remote, show debug.  Just ignore `set variable ...'.
>> 
>> info is for ``showing things about the program being debugged]] - info
>> frame, info registers, info symbols
>> 
>> There can be overlap between a `set/show' and `info', but I don't
>> think that occures here.
> 
> 
> So, you'd prefer "maint info {,p}symtabs", then?

It isn't a question of personal preference.  `maint show' would be wrong.

`maint info ....'

appears to be the best fit.

> Existing commands:
> - info sources
> - info functions

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-15 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-07 23:41 Jim Blandy
2003-04-08  7:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-08 17:52   ` Jim Blandy
2003-04-08 21:13     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-09  0:09       ` Jim Blandy
2003-04-10  2:10         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-10 20:29           ` Jim Blandy
2003-04-10 21:49             ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-10 21:56               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-12  9:34             ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-04-14 18:43               ` Jim Blandy
2003-04-14 18:52                 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-14 19:05                   ` David Carlton
2003-04-14 19:27                     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-14 22:41                   ` Jim Blandy
2003-04-14 23:40                     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-15  1:45                       ` Jim Blandy
2003-04-15 15:49                         ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-04-17 22:09                           ` Jim Blandy
2003-04-19  7:40                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-05-07 21:43                             ` Jim Blandy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E9C29EE.30409@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jimb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox