Hi!

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 11:31:37PM +0200, Stephane Carrez wrote:
> 
>>Hi!
>>
>>Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>>
>>>I could be wrong, but I don't think you can put comments in the
>>>middle of a gdb_expect block like this.
>>>
>>> +    # marker4() is defined at line 46 when compiled with -DPROTOTYPES
>>> +    -re "Breakpoint $decimal, marker4 \\(d=177601976\\) at 
>>> .*$srcfile:46\[\r\n\]+46\[\t \]+void marker4.*" {
>>> +	pass "run until breakpoint set at small function, optimized file"
>>> +    }
>>>
>>>I think you have to do this:
>>>
>>> -re "Breakpoint ... void marker.*" {
>>>   # marker4() is defined at line 46 when compiled with -DPROTOTYPES
>>>   pass "run until breakpoint set at small function, optimized file"
>>> }
>>>
>>>Michael C
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I wasn't sure too..
>>
>>But I verified that it worked before the commit...
> 
> 
> It may have worked, but Michael is right.  It will parse the comment as
> a series of patterns and code blocks.
> 
Ok, it's very bad then.  I've removed the patch.

	Stephane

2003-04-05  Stephane Carrez  <stcarrez@nerim.fr>

	* gdb.base/break.exp: Revert last patch.