From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25379 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2003 16:42:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25371 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2003 16:42:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2003 16:42:27 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0DD2B23; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:42:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E8329F1.90805@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:42:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: fnasser@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PING/testsuite] new test gdb.base/pr-1090.exp References: <200303031632.h23GWLG26759@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00549.txt.bz2 Yes, ok, but, apparently the file name convention is pr1090 rather than pr-1090. Andrew