From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15320 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2003 17:10:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15300 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2003 17:10:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (207.219.125.105) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 17:10:49 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C902B11; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:10:43 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E7F3C13.5080708@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:10:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH ARM add new set/show arm commands References: <200303240947.h2O9lEZ29462@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00473.txt.bz2 > This patch starts the process of moving the arm-specific set/show options >> > into a sub-group. For the moment I've only done this for the set/show >> > disassembly-flavor command, where I've also taken the opportunity to drop >> > "flavor" from the command (it's non-intuitive if you speak English-English >> > :-) > >> >> See: set [?] disassembler, replace disassembly-flavour or flavor[sic] >> http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=548 >> >> enjoy, >> Andrew >> >> > >> > So we now have >> > >> > set arm disassembly >> > >> > and >> > >> > show arm disassembly > > > Are you suggesting I should change the option name to "set arm > disassembler"? If so, I've no problem with that. If not, what are you Yes, just "set arm disassembler". Er, actually, is "set arm disassembler-options" better? Either name is more in line with the existing objdump --disassembler-options option. Andrew > suggesting? Currently ARM does not support a "set arm architecture", > though it might be needed for supporting interworking binaries and calls > to functions from gdb. > > R. > >