From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26657 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2003 14:50:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26615 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2003 14:50:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2003 14:50:01 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF9E2B11; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:50:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E6F491A.4050401@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:50:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: bob_rossi@cox.net, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, nick@nick.uklinux.net Subject: Re: [rfc] Annotation level THREE References: <200303120609.h2C69h904491@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00274.txt.bz2 > Hi Andrew, > > >> With this and its doco in, I think 5.4 is clear to go (or at least try to). > > > The last time I looked in detail was 2003-02-16: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-02/msg00257.html > > At that time, there were still several high priority PR's about build > issues; x86-64 regresions; and java fails the 'break main' test. > > Do you care about any of these things? `or at least try to'. As far as I know this is the only feature that could block the next release. It's critical that a GDB release containing this be made soon. - x86-64 was always broken - java improvements would be nice A real concern is that `long long' regression. Andrew