From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31496 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2003 14:58:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31489 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2003 14:58:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2003 14:58:46 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCB82A9C; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 09:58:43 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E68B3A3.10805@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 14:58:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Carlton Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [dictionary] commit for 2003-03-06 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2 > Following Andrew's lead, It wasn't my lead. GCC pretty much run branches this way. > I'm going to try to remember to post my > commits to carlton_dictionary-branch. They won't always be the > prettiest commits: I usually commit once at the end of each day that > I've done any work on the branch, assuming that I leave it in a > working state (which I almost always do!); this means that a commit > may contain something that I plan to continue the next day, and it > also may contain bits of unrelated tasks that I'm working on. Also, > the ChangeLogs aren't great: they're written in a way that is easy to > generate, as opposed to a way that is easiest to review years in the > future. Even if it doesn't build, do you care? Andrew