From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30786 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2003 18:53:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30779 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 18:53:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 18:53:40 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E442A9C; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 13:53:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E64F632.4070005@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 18:53:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Eli Zaretskii , Corinna Vinschen Subject: Re: [RFA]: File-I/O patch, Documentation References: <20021121100443.U24928@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3E5D4C4C.1040502@redhat.com> <20030227083701.GE20955@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3E5E9A1A.9000708@redhat.com> <20030228083308.GG24097@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3E5F807D.9080506@redhat.com> <20030228154730.GK20955@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3E617364.9060700@redhat.com> <20030303121249.GM1193@cygbert.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00108.txt.bz2 [added Eli] > On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 09:58:44PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> Well the texinfo. I read the reference as a reference to something >> completly separate. >> >> Can you please expand the paragraph to reference: Protocol specific >> representation of datatypes. > > > Uhm... sorry but is it possible that you didn't read the texinfo file > created by my patch send the week before but instead the one from > December? I just looked through the doc and I was a bit surprised > to see that there isn't any reference to B.1 but instead there's > already a "(see @ref{Integral datatypes}, for details)" in it. Yes. I'm having a `bad hair' day :-( > I've attached the new version of my patch with the following changes: > > - Using M packets for memory transfer is redefined so that the target > should expect M or X packets. The current implementation (my patch) > uses only X packets so far. I forgot that in the original document. > > - The "Integral datatypes" chapter contains a hint that these datatypes > are passed as big endian when part of a memory transfer of a compound > type. > > - The "Integral datatypes" chapter defines time_t as seconds since Epoch. > > - A new "File-I/O Examples" chapter. I just tried to build a pdf file using this patch and it died with: (/usr/share/texmf/pdftex/plain/misc/pdfcolor.tex) fonts, page headings, tables, conditionals, indexing, sectioning, toc, environments, defuns, macros, cross references, (/usr/share/texmf/tex/plain/dvips/epsf.tex) localization, and turning on texinfo input format.) (./gdb.aux ! Missing @endcsname inserted. @ The `F@ request packet-title @xrdef ...@endgroup @expandafter @gdef @csname X#1 @endcsname l.862 'xrdef {The `F' request packet-title} {The \code {F} request packet} ? Changing the line: @subsection The @code{F} request packet (and a second very similar in a similar way) to: @subsection The `F' request packet fixed the problem. This has me totally puzzled since other @subsection lines use @..{} and work fine. Eli? Andrew PS: pdftex on a RHAT 7.2 system.