From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22063 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2003 19:32:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22055 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 19:32:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 19:32:03 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757072A9C; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:34:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E5D16BB.4090603@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:32:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Michal Ludvig , Elena Zannoni , GDB Patches Subject: Re: PING: [RFA] Runtime Dwarf2 CFI engine cleanup References: <3E197C8F.3010903@suse.cz> <15934.38824.98344.150611@localhost.redhat.com> <3E479B6A.30705@suse.cz> <3E5CDEB8.2050008@suse.cz> <20030226154714.GA11458@nevyn.them.org> <3E5D05F9.6050605@redhat.com> <20030226183555.GA16345@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00730.txt.bz2 >> Puzzled expression. > > > This is the problem with vague lines of authority. It's not always > clear who can approve a patch even to people who do the approving. I'm > tired of exercising what seems to be pretty clear authority to approve > something and getting prickly mail from someone else overturning my > decision. The file is dwarf2*, when originally approved, it was done by a dwarf2 maintainer. I'm sorry but, at least here, I'm really struggling to see how, this can be somehow vague or ill defined. Andrew